This era in history may be remembered as the "Peak Age", a brief time when nearly all materials used to power and create our society reach the maximum extraction and production potential. Past this point, all of these resources become increasingly difficult to extract until they are no longer economically viable resources to be using. There are hundreds of examples of resources, currently embedded in our industrial society, which have reached their peak in the 50 years surrounding 2010, but the one which will most impact our society is petroleum.

The goal of living for 100 days without oil is to understand the extent of our dependance on oil in American society today. Specifically, how it will affect my life, as a 25 year-oil living in Minneapolis, MN. By using myself as a metric I can take a close and conscious look at where oil dependance occurs in all aspects of our daily lives : How we transport ourselves from one place to another, what we eat, how much waste we create, how water is cleaned and transported, where oil is used as; an energy resource, in conventional medicine and for hygiene and how oil affects how we entertain ourselves and communicate with others. By demonstrating how someone would be forced to live without using any oil resources, outlining both what the sacrifices will be as well as the benefits, we can can identify the many systems which will have to be re-designed in a world without cheap oil, and explore a new way of living in which we live in an energy balance.


(At the bottom of this page is a link to my version of a flow diagram of 'Where Petroleum Exists in Our Daily Lives' (using information from the Energy Information Administration-Annual Energy Review 2008 fig 5.0 Petroleum flow) click and zoom to enlarge)


Sunday, September 19, 2010

DAY 34_CYCLOPATH

17 September 2010

My fabulous friend Amber recommended me this website for finding bike routes through Minneapolis. 

http://www.cyclopath.org/

Cyclopath allows you to put in your preferences as far as; quickest route vs most bikable route, hill slope, only bike paths vs busy streets.  It can be modified by anyone living here so there is quite a bit of detail as far as what part of the route is good or bad and so on.  Awesome site, can't believe I never knew this existed. 

I mapped my route from Uptown to the University of Minnesota St. Paul campus (most frequent commute route). 



route by byway type (bike paths vs busy streets)
 

slope of route

Google maps also has a bike route function for those of you who don't live in Minneapolis, or didn't know. 

Its been raining quite a bit this week.  The other night the rain was pelting so hard it felt like hail.  I have to do more laundry when it rains because all the junk off the street gets all over my clothes. 

There are some strange forces of the earth that allow it to typically rain hard ONLY when I am on my bike.  My advisor, Virajita says she can tell if its going to rain if she knows I am biking around ;)  Fabulous.



DAY 33_FOOD ENERGY (A LOAF OF BREAD)

16 September 2010

While my initial requirements for food were; eating locally and organically (to avoid long-range transportation and petroleum-based fertilizers), I've come to understand that food is also a huge energy user.

This article (Energy Use in the U.S. Food System, by Patrick Canning, Ainsley Charles, Sonya Haung, Karen R. Polenske and Arnold Wasters, ERR-94, USDA Economic Research Service, March 2010, available at www.ers.usda.gov/publications/err94) is an interesting introduction to the huge amount of energy is used in food every year from; agricultural machinery and fuel for these machines, transportation of food, food processing, food packaging, ovens, stoves, microwaves, home appliances, and even down to the cookware used to make food. 

As the article states, "In 2007, the U.S. food system accounted for almost 16 percent of the Nation's energy budget." and "Between 1997 and 2002, over 80 percent of the increase in annual U.S. energy consumption was food related."  They identify three main reasons why-even as other energy use has remained stable-food related energy has increased so dramatically. 

(1) Population growth has accounted for 25% of food-related energy use.  Our nationwide population has grown by more than 14 million in give years from 1997 to 2002. More mouths to feed.

(2) While there has been a greater proportion of foods that used less energy (fresh produce, fish...) purchased over energy-intensive processed foods, this change came with a "substantial increase in food marketed per capita to U.S. consumers)  People are eating more food.

(3) We are using more energy-intensive technologies which account for about half of the increase in food-energy.  "Businesses faced with increasing labor costs, while energy prices were lower...A shift from human labor to energy-using equipment occurred for all food and food-related commodity groups."  More and more household are adopting labor-laving technologies to save time preparing food and cleaning it.  "In 1985, 18-64 year olds spent an estimated average of 49 minutes on cooking and cleanup per day.  Dureau of Labor Statistics' data indicate average cooking and cleanup times per household fell to 31 minutes per day in 2008." 

I wanted to analyze the energy it takes to produce one loaf (1 kg) of bread with various at home  methods and industry methods. This first chart shows an energy comparison of only the BAKING energy used (in kWh) for 4 different scenarios: Quick bread (tortillas from earlier post), Bread machine, Manual kneading+Oven baking (at 350 degrees for 1 hour) and Industrial baking. 

As you can see, cooking in the oven actually uses more energy (2 kWh) than industrial baking (.7 kWh).  This is due to the high volume of bread being made in industrial kitchens.  Baking is only a small part of the energy it takes to create a loaf of bread, however. What is interesting, is a comparison of the TOTAL energy it take to create this loaf of bread, looking at all stages of its life cycle.  I used this article (Andersson, K., and T. Ohlsson. (1999) “Life Cycle Assessment of Bread Produced on Different Scales.” International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 4(1): 25-40.) for my numbers. 

The two scenarios I looked at in this chart were an 'Industry' produced loaf of bread (example Sara Lee or Pepperidge farm), versus a 'Home' scenario which ingredients are bought in bulk, and are all local.

_'Consumer phase' refers to how much energy it takes to operate the shopping side of obtaining the bread (grocery store lighting and heating etc),.
_'Packaging phase' is limited in my 'home' scenario because I am buying everything in bulk, there is still a small amount of packaging which food is in when it arrives at the store. 
_'Transportation' phase is also limited in the 'home' scenario because I am buying all ingredients locally
_'Food Processing' phase refers to the amount of energy it takes for all processing and baking
_'Agriculture' phase is the same for both scenarios because they are using the same ingredients.

In the end, the 'Industry' scenario used 3.61 kWh to produce one loaf of bread and the 'Home' scenario used 2.02 kWh.  The 1.59 kWh saved for each loaf of bread comes from the decreased travel distance (local ingredients) and the lack of packaging (bulk foods). 

I also read the following articles when researching this, both very interesting:
 Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of the Production of Home made and Industrial Bread in Sweden
http://www.infra.kth.se/fms/utbildning/lca/projects%202006/Group%2003%20(Bread).pdf

Life-Cycle Based Sustainability Indicators for Assessment of the U.S. Food System:
http://css.snre.umich.edu/css_doc/CSS00-04.pdf

Friday, September 17, 2010

DAY 32_LOCAL BREWERIES AND WINERIES

15 September 2010
I got called out by my thesis committee the other night drinking a beer.  Most beer made locally isn't actually 'local' because many of the crucial ingredients (malts, hops) are from all over the country and world.  In search of a truly local beer we will be having a local dinner where everyone brings a local (Minnesota) beer/wine.  The catch is I am trying to get everyone to research where each brewery sources its ingredients.  For example, St. Croix Brewing Co is the first beer in the nation to ferment with pure maple syrup (which have plenty of locally).  It will be interesting to see if there are any truly local beers (all ingredients grown and harvested locally). 

Following is a list of local breweries/wineries that I have discovered over the course of this project, I'm sure there are more.  Also, many of these breweries offer beer in growlers (jug beer) which are returnable-thus creating no waste! 

_Surly (Brooklyn Center, MN, no relation to bikes) http://www.surlybrewing.com/
_Lift Bridge (Stillwater, MN) http://www.liftbridgebrewery.com/
_Town Hall (Seven Corners Minneapolis)
_Great River's (St. Paul)
_Brau Brothers (Lucan, MN) http://www.braubeer.com/
_Cold Spring (Cold Spring, MN) http://www.coldspringbrewery.com/
_Finnegans Irish Amber (one produce one beer, but 100% of profits to to help the working poor and at rish youth, brewed by Summit) http://www.finnegans.org/
_Fulton (Minneapolis's newest brewery) http://www.fultonbeer.com/
_Lake Superior Brewing Co (Duluth, MN) http://www.lakesuperiorbrewing.com/
_Mantorville Brewing Co (Mantorville, MN) http://www.mantorvillebeer.com/
_Pig's Eye Brewing Co. (St. Paul) http://www.pigseyebeer.com/
_August Schell Brewing Co (second oldest family-run brewery in the US, survived the prohibition!)http://www.schellsbrewery.com/
_St. Croix Brewing Co (St. Paul-first american beer fermented with pure maple syrup)  http://www.stcroixbeer.com/
_Vine Park Brewing Co. (St. Paul-growlers only?) http://www.vinepark.com/

WINE:
_Alexis Bailly (Hastings)
_Cannon River Winery (Cannon Falls)
_Carlos Creek Winery (Alexandria)
_Falconer Vineyards (Red Wing)
_Fieldstone Vineyards (Morgan)
_Forestedge Winery (Laporte)
_Goose Lake Farm (Elk River)
_Luedke's Winery (Princeton)
_Minnestalgia Wines (haha McGregor)
_Morgan Creek Vineyards (New Ulm)
_Northerm Vineyards (Stillwater)
_Olde County Winery (Lake Lillian)
_Saint Croix Vineyards (Stillwater)
_Santiago's Winery (Alexandria)
_Scenic Valley (Lanesboro)
_Winehaven (Chisago City)
_Beven's Creek Vineyard and Nursery (Carver)
_Crofut Family Winery (Peterson)
_Glacial Ridge Winery (Spicer)
_Great River Vineyard (Lake City)
_Millner Heritage Vineyard (Kimball)
_Post Town Winery (Byron, MN)
_Salem Glen Vineyard (Rochester)
_Two Fools (Plummer)
_Whitewater Wines (Plainview)
_Winterhaven Vineyard (Janesville)
_Woodland Hill Winery (Delano)

 Surprised that we have wineries in Minnesota? So was I.  Many of the wines are made from Frontenac grapes, which are a local cold-weather grapes.  Check out your area for local wineries, I think you'd be surprised. 

Thursday, September 16, 2010

DAY 31_TEFLON (THE PETROLEUM IN YOUR PAN)

14 September 2010

Teflon (the non-stick coating in pans) has been a subject of some controversy in our house lately ;)-being a petroleum product, I think it deserves some attention here....

I'll use this nice introduction from www.wisegeek.com/what-is-teflon.htm:

"Teflon as been a familiar name for decades.  Invented at DuPont's Jackson Laboratory in 1938, Teflon is actually a substance called polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE), which is considered to be the most slippery substance that exists.  Its nonstick properties have transcended the kitchen, and is widely used in other areas including aerospace, communications, electronics, industrial processes, and architecture. Teflon changed the plastics industry forever, and DuPont has received numerous awards and recognitions for its contribution to the field of man made polymers.

Its likely that just about every home in America has Teflon somewhere.  As a carpet protector, it repels liquids so that nasty spills on carpet can be wiped up clean without leaving a stain.  The same technology can also protect the fabric on furniture.  It is also used as an automotive lubricant, and even protects bulbs from shattering. 

There are numerous industrial uses for Teflon as well, in areas such as semiconductor, manufacturing, pharmaceutical and biotech manufacturing, and industrial bakeware.  Eyeglass wearers may even have Teflon on their eyeglass lenses.  In the area of personal care, it is used as a fingernail protector, and even in a line of haircare products.  Teflon is applied to pots and pans in a multi-step process that helps ensure that the material stays stuck to the surface.  The first applied layer includes a sticky molecule that helps adhere the non-stick Teflon to the surface, this is followed by an application of non-stick surface only, and the final coating is a combination of non-stick Teflon with other hardeners."

There are varying opinions about the safety of Teflon for the environment and communities located near manufacturing plants:

"The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) asserts that DuPont has purposely withheld health hazardous information regarding Teflon since the early 1908's.  Petroflouronanoic acid (PFOA), a chemical used to produce Teflon, has been appearing in blood samples of people world wide.  DuPont, slapped with approximately 300 million dollars in fines, has agreed to pay a 108 million dollar lawsuit brought about by residents near one of its company plants as elevated levles of PFOA's have been found in surrounding drinking water supplies. "
(http://whatscookingamerica.net/LindaPosch/ToxicCookware.htm)

While causing environmental air/water quality problems is one things, its daily use is another...All plastics are in their most stable state when they are solids.  While they off-gas a small amount as solids, once they are heated they begin off gassing quite a bit more.  A new car smell is actually the plastic elements and other chemicals (in seating fabric etc...)that are being off-gassed as they sit in the hot sun in an unventilated place (closed car).  The same is true with Teflon cooking pans. 

There is signicifant evidence that the fumes are toxic enough to kill birds:

"In cases of "Teflon toxicosis," as the bird poisonings are called, the lungs of exposed birds hemorrhage and fill with fluid, leading to suffocation.  DuPont acknowledges that the fumes can also sicken people, a condition called "polymer fume fever." DuPont has never studied the incidence of the fever among users of the billions of non-sick pots and pans sold around the world.  Neither has the company studied the long-term effects from the sickness, or the extent to which Teflon exposures lead to human illnesses believed erroneously to be the common flu.  The government has not assessed the safety of non-stick cookware.  According to a Food and Drug Administration (FDA) food safety scientists. "You won't find a regulation anywhere on the books that specifically addresses cookwares," although the FDA approved Teflon for contact with food in 1960 based on a food frying study that found higher levels of Teflon chemicals in hamburger cooked on heat-aged and old pans.  At the time, FDA judged these levels to be of little health significance.

Of the 6.9 million bird-owning households in the US that claim an estimated 19 million pet birds, many don't know that Teflon poses an acute hazard to birds.  Most non-stick cookware carries no warming label.  DuPont publicly acknowledges that Teflon can kill birds, but the company-produced public service brochure on bird safety discusses the hazards of ceiling fans, mirrors, toilet, and cats before mentioning the danger of Teflon fumes.

As a result of the new data showing that non-stick surfaces reach toxic temperature in a matter of minutes, EWG has petitioned the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) to require that cookware and heated appliances bearing non-stick coatings must carry a label warming of the acute hazard the coating poses to pet birds.  Additionally, EQG recommends that bird owners completely avoid cookware and heated appliances with non-stick coatings.  Alternative cookware includes glass, stainless steel and cast iron, neither of which off-gases persistent pollutants that kill birds."

While there are conflicting opinions about the temperature at which the Teflon fumes begins to become toxic: Wikipedia sources say 260 C degrees is when it begins to deteriorate and at 350 C it decomposes.  Other sources say the Teflon begins to off-gas at lower temperatures.  It is likely that these numbers are determined by what is a 'safe' level of toxins to be in the air without have negative side effects.

No matter what the true off-gassing answer is, the point remains that Teflon is a toxic chemical, and not something that should be on objects that are INTENTIONALLY heated-cooking pans.

Lastly in ALL studies done on Teflon which I have encountered, it is stated that Teflon is safe when 'properly used'.  How to 'properly use' your pan is either not included or in the fine print.  Deeper research (and personal experience) reveals that Teflon is quite destructible.  It is not intended to be coming off the pans, and when it does, it becomes an even greater hazard than inhaling possible toxic fumes.  EATING Teflon flakes isn't exactly something you want to do. 

"One of the major disadvantages of using Teflon cookware is that it must be treated very carefully or the non-stick coating can be marred or destroyed.  Teflon pans should never be used with metal utensils.  If you tend to cut meat or vegetables directly in the pan, steer away from using Teflon!" (http://tuberose.com/Teflon.html.)

Basically, if you own Teflon pans, do not:
_scrape the food off the pan
_cut the food on the pan
_store the pan anywhere it can be scratched in any way (stacking pots)
_leave the pan in the sink where other dishes (silverware) can scratch it

Ultimately, with other options of pan materials available to us (cast iron, ceramic, stainless steel and aluminum), why risk possible health problems for a little added (non-stick) convenience?

I have been forced to abandon a multitude of habits and methods of doing things during the course of this project that I consider to be more convenient: turning on tap water, turning on a light, taking a long shower, buying personal care products from anywhere in the world that last for years, getting in a car, picking up pre-made food in boxes...While only some of these habits DIRECTLY negatively affect our health and lives, many indirectly do as they effect the environment in which we live.  Finding alternatives for these ways of life is often difficult, however, finding other methods for at least the habits which are direct risks to our health seems like a good starting point.

Petroleum use has certainly increased the 'convenience' of our daily lives, but at what cost?  At the risk of sounding preachy, it has been an amazing experience up to this point to slow down and spend time doing some of the everyday tasks that I normally rushed through.  Doing laundry, taking a long time to make dinner (because it takes a long time to make everything from scratch :P), and commuitng by bike are all tasks which, on one had eat time out of my day, and on the other hand allow me to appreciate and understand where many of the things I originally took for granted are coming from, and the energy it takes to accomplish these tasks for my 'convenience'.

As my chair, Tom Fisher puts it, we need to redefine what the word 'scarcity' and 'abundance' really mean in our society.  What is it that we value and brings us happiness in our lives?  Is our current definition of 'abundance' representative of the way we really want to be living?

Tuesday, September 14, 2010

DAY 30_LAUNDRY DAY

13 September 2010

Laundry day!  Definitely time.

I'm saving 3 gallons of water every day (of my 15 gallons total) to use for cleaning at the end of the week (2.3 gallons a day for laundry=15 gallons end of week) and (.7 gallons/day for a 5 gallon bucket shower heated in the sun).  Here's how I do it:

(1) dump in 1/4 cup of laundry detergent

(2) boil a gallon of water (about 0.625 kWh) and dump into 5 gallon pail with 3 more gallons of room-temp water (dumping over detergent makes it foamy)

(3) add clothes

(4) let soak for an hour

(5) stomp on clothes.  stomp until all clothes are flattened in the bucket then move them around again and re stomp (water is still warm after an hour so its kinda nice)

(6) mash up clothes with hands (this is actually an awesome stress reliever if you really get into it)

(7) dump wash water (if I had used homemade detergent I could probably use this for plants....not there yet) Also, its actually quite gratifying to see all the dirty water going down the drain, it is dirtier than you would think being that we never see how dirty our wash water actually is, makes you feel like you really accomplished something)

(8) refill with room temp water and mash the clothes again, a lot. This gets all the soap out

(9) refill one more time and dump (total of three fills is about 15 gallons)

(10) hang clothes in the tub on a line.  The clothes will be really wet (not like when you take them out of the washer and they've gone through a spin cycle) so they need to be wrung out and put in a place they can drip for a while. 

I did a little research on a typical washing machine cycle so that I could compare it with my bucket method.  According to the Environmental Protection Agency http://www.epa.gov/WaterSense/ the average washing machine uses 41 gallons per load.  Higher efficiency washing machines bring this number down to under 28 but that is still quite a bit of water.  When I was doing bucket laundry I started thinking about what a washing machine does and how I could substitute myself for one.  Basically, the washing machine fills the tub up with water and agitate it with the center agitator for a while.   After that, it drains all the water out by spinning it into the side holes and refills to rinse the clothes, and spins again.  While I'm not a washing machine, I think my clothes mashing did a pretty good job of cleaning in general, and it was all using my own energy for washing, a total of 0.625 kWh (heating water).

According to http://michaelbluejay.com/electricity/laundry.html

hot/warm cycle uses 4.5 kWh/load
warm/warm cycle uses 3.5 kWh/load
hot/cold cycle uses 2.8 kWh/load
warm/cold cycle uses 1.9 kWh/load
cold/cold cycle uses 0.3 kWh/load

I'm assuming these numbers are taking into account the energy needed to heat the water and that is why they are different, I'll be metering my washing machine next time one of my roommates is washing...

DAY 29_SORTING WASTE

12 September 2010

With almost a month of the project down, I sorted through the waste I have accumulated over the last 4 weeks to see what patterns there were and what waste types I can try to eliminate. 

There really isn't  any 'random' garbage, all of the things I've accumulated can be put in categories more or less:

_twist-ties (from wrapping greens and other vegetables together)
_milk top plastic rings (even though the containers/caps are reusable there is still this small waste)
_bottle caps
_sunflower oil bottles/plastic tops
_beer/wine bottles
_plastic packaging (from books ordered online and empty soil bags)
_paper waste (junk mail, office paper waste)

Even though the majority of this waste (at least size and weight) is recyclable, I cannot recycle during this project because, that too, uses petroleum to fuel recycling trucks.  Both recycling and waste trucks have the lowest gas-mileage numbers of almost any vehicles made, around 3-4 mpg ($20 per gallon).  They are really big, heavy, and carry lots of stuff.  So while recycling, yes, is better, it still isn't great.  Finding ways to eliminate waste altogether is a much better way to deal with the issue.

Ways I have found so far to decrease and eliminate waste are:

1_Buy in bulk: almost ANYTHING can be found in bulk at food co-ops and more and more at regular grocery stores.  Buying bulk is cheaper because you aren't paying for any packaging, and it is almost guaranteed to be fresher.  "Once you buy bulk you will never go back", (Marcos Lopez-Carlson at the Wedge Co-op))
2_Bring reusable containers for all your bulk shopping and produce shopping.  This eliminates the need for all those small plastic bags which cannot even be used as garbage container bags.
3_Compost: Either indoors with worms (if you live in a small space with no yard) or outside in a backyard bin.  Composting eliminates organics which turn to sludge in landfills and are unable to decompose, it also can be sold once finished to gardeners.  Many cities (or neighborhoods) are starting compost collection pickups.  With worms, however, compost hardly accumulates, so your organic waste literally become a non-accumulating cycle.)  Compost also allows our house to take out the trash less often because our trash doesn't smell, and it fills up less quickly. 
4_Give preference to products which come in returnable/reusable containers.  I haven't found many of these so far, but in Minneapolis you can get milk in returnables from Cedar Summit.  Find breweries that allow you to buy returnable growlers (Great Waters, Town Hall and Flat Earth in Minneapolis) thanks laurie :)
5_Opt out of junk mail (http://www.privacyrights.org/fs/fs4-junk.htm)
6_Reuse whatever waste you can (reuse glass jars for filling bulk foods, as planters...) I save all rubber bands that come on greens for later use.
7_Shred newspaper for composting (soy wax can be safely composted) and use as worm bedding.

Virajita mentioned to me today that there are actually different amounts charged for various sizes of garbage cans, and her family was able to switch their large garbage cart for a smaller one.  I had no idea Minneapolis did this (or any US city for that matter) and I'm guessing a lot of others don't know about it.  If you live in a situation where you have your own garbage cans, contact Hennepin County to get a smaller bin!

"The number of carts and recycling bins at your service address are what the previous owner needed for their weekly services. You will continue to have these for your weekly garbage and recycling use, but if you wish to increase or decrease the number of garbage carts or recycling bins you have, please contact our office at (612) 673-2917" (Hennepin County website)

.When looking at the Minneapolis Solid Waste website (http://www.ci.minneapolis.mn.us/solid-waste/garbage.asp
) it only mentions that there are large or small carts.  This seems like something that Hennepin County could promote as an environmental benefit as well as a way to reduce their own workload and need for trucks/fuel.  Virajita had noticed that they never filled their cart up and called to see about getting a smaller one, they switched it out and the cost is reduced slightly.  Waste (like energy and water costs) are not reflective of true cost.  As petroleum becomes more and more expensive, we will likely see an increased cost for garbage pick up and restrictions for how much can be dumped from each resident.  Until that happens, however, people will likely continue to create waste, unconscious of some of the simple ways they could change their own behaviors to reduce and even eliminate it.

Because it has been almost impossible to not create ANY waste, the little waste I am collecting will be saved until the end of the project.  It isn't a problem to save because there is no organic waste (all being composted) so everything is empty bottles and plastic/paper of some kind. According to the Hennepin County website: "None of your garbage goes into a landfill. City of Minneapolis garbage goes to the Hennepin Energy Resource Co. (HERC).Located in downtown Minneapolis, the HERC facility uses mass burn technology to convert 365,000 tons of garbage a year into electricity that is sold to Xcel Energy, Inc."  While there are benefits to burning waste (like creating energy) there are also major hazards. 

The documentary film, Blue Vinyl illustrates some of these hazards very clearly.  While the focus of the film is on vinyl waste, the topic is an accumulation of plastic waste which-once created-has almost NO safe means of disposal.  It will not biodegrade, you can't bury it without risks of toxins leaching into the soil, you don't want it to end up in your water supply and you can't safely burn most of it without releasing some of the most deadly toxins known to this earth.  Plastic is a huge waste accumulation problem because it is so durable, but burning it really isn't a good option either. 

As much as possible I would like to find ways to eliminate the kinds of waste that I am still accumulating, or find other useful purposes for it.   Ultimately, everything I collect during the 100 days I will personally deliver by bicycle to the HERC facility :) I bet they'll love that.

Sunday, September 12, 2010

DAY 28_TRANSPLANTS + MINI FRIDGE

11 September 2010

I moved all the vegetable seedlings that made it into 1 gallon pots today.  So far in pots I have growing: 3 bell peppers, 1 jalapeno, 1 lemon balm (with 2 sprouts), 1 basil, 1 storage bin of cilantro (3 sprouts).  I'm also beginning to realize that the soil depth that I have available in the seed flats (only about an 1.5" isn't going to be enough for the microgreens.  The recommended depth is 3-5" and I think once the plants get bigger they won't be able to hold themselves up with only an inch of root depth. I transplanted the half of the flat that was collard greens into some storage bins I had.  I'm not sure how well they will do transplanted because they were planted so densely that moving them was kind of difficult (as you can see in the picture) I also started another storage bin (about 6"x6"x1') of new collards to germinate so I'll have a continuous supply of greens as I eat them. 

I also measured the electricity usage of my mini fridge today.  I plugged the Kill-A-Watt meter in for 24 hours to get a reading of one day of use.  It came out to using 22.63 watts/hr, over 24 hours using 0.543 kWh/day.  The big fridge uses 68.1 watts/hr (1.68kWh/day).  This means that the mini fridge is using less than a third of the energy of the big one!  I was surprised about this because I didn't think those little fridges were very energy-efficient, but I'm able to save 1.087 kWh/day now using it.  The problem is that I have to be more picky about what gets refrigerated now that I have significantly less space.  Apples, pears, yeast, onions and peppers are no longer refrigerated.  Instead I have to leave room for the things that absolutely need refrigeration; milk, butter, sunflower oil, eggs, cheese, maple syrup, leftovers.  I think we generally over-refrigerate food.  While most things will last longer being refrigerated, some foods actually do better without refrigeration.  I've started leaving all greens and herbs in glasses of water on the counter instead of putting them in the fridge and they seem to last longer.